Basic HTML Version
M
ORFÉMA
-
ALTERNÁCIÓK A MOKSA
-
MORDVIN NÉVSZÓRAGOZÁSBAN
151
Mészáros Edit 1998: Erza-mordvin nyelvkönyv kezdőknek és középhaladók-
nak. JATEPress, Szeged.
MK 2000 = Н. С. Алямкин (ред.), Мокшень кяль. Морфология. Красный
Октябрь типографиясь, Саранск.
МRV = Мокшень–рузонь валкс / Мокшанско-русский словарь. (Ред. Б.
А. Серебренников, А. П. Феоктистов, О. Е. Поляков). Русский язык,
Дигора, Москва, 1998.
Ornatov 1938: П. Орнатов, Мордовская грамматика, составленнная по
наречию мордвы-мокши. Москва.
Paasonen, Heikki 1903: Mordvinische lautlehre. MSFOu 22. Helsingfors.
Paasonen, Heikki 1909: Mordwinische chrestomathie mit glossar und gram-
matikalischem abriss. Helsingfors.
Rueter, Jack 2010: Adnominal Person in the Morphological System of Erzya.
MSFOu 261. Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, Helsinki.
Szerebrennyikov 1967: Б. А. Серебренников, Историческая морфология
мордовских языков. Наука, Москва.
Zaicz Gábor (ed.) 1995: Zur Frage der uralischen Schriftsprachen. Linguisti-
ca, Series A, Studia et dissertationes, 17. Budapest.
Zaicz Gábor 1998: Mordva. In: Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic Languages.
Routledge, London – New York. 184–218.
Zaicz Gábor 2000: Az egységes mordvin irodalmi nyelv kérdése. FUD 7:
109–131.
*
Morpheme alternations in the Moksha-Mordvin definite
and possessive declension
The linking rules in the nominative of the definite declension are most
simple: 1) The
-ś
suffix is most often added to the base form (NomSgIndet) ir-
respective of its ending:
keńkš-ś
’door’
.
2) After a nasal consonant, the suffix
is affricated:
on
’dream’ :
on-ć.
3) The stem-final vowel of sequences after certain
word-internal consonant-clusters
(-C + k
ä
, g
ä
, d
ä
, ď
ä
, m
ä
)
is dropped:
pang
ä
’mushroom’ :
pang-ś.
The plural suffixes of the definite declension are based on those of the inde-
finite plural declension. Therefore, from the morphological aspect, morpho-
phonological alternations similar to the ones in the singular number of the in-
definite declension are not observable in these suffixes. In the dependent cases,
only analytic forms are used.
The greatest, irreconcilable differences between the Erzya and Moksha no-
minal declension system are present in the grammatical cases of the possessive
declension (nominative, genitive and dative).